Stealing Citizens' Rights


In 1883, Robert G. Street of Texas wrote a paper before the American Bar
Association
designed to steal the rights of the citizens of the United States.  In
that paper Mr. Street
asked a very important question: „What could a citizen do if the
Judicial, Legislative, and
Executive Branches of government claimed to be immune from suit from a
citizen.‰  In
the same issue of the report of the ABA meeting the answer was given,
„if all three
branches of government claim to be immune from suits by the citizen,
there is noting the
citizen can do but revolt.‰ 
Shortly thereafter,  a cause of action began working its way to the
Supreme Court to test
this stealing of the rights of the citizen.  In 1890, the Supreme Court
heard this challenge
to the rights of the citizen.  In a landmark theft of the rights of the
citizen, the Supreme
Court ruled that it was not possible for a citizen to sue his own State
without the
permission of the legislature. 
In Texas at the same time it was statute law that a citizen could sue
the State.  In order to
steal the right to sue the State in Texas, some underhanded measures had
to be taken. 
First, Richard Coke, a Texas governor after the civil war, caused the
laws to be reprinted. 
In order to steal the right the Governor set up a committee to codify
the law.  During the
codification, the law was left out of the law books.  Then, Governor
Coke fired the
Supreme Court (with permission) and replaced them with his appointees. 
Doing these
two things perfected his stealing of the law from the citizen.
The reason Governor Coke stole the law was to protect himself from suit
for what he did
after the end of the Civil War.  Coke had been removed from the Supreme
Court for
being an impediment to reconstruction and feared that his actions on the
court would lead
to legal problems.
This law  allowing suits  against Texas remained stolen from the people
until I
discovered it in the Archives.  The law has never been amended,
repealed, or ruled upon
by a judge.  As a result, it is still valid law.  I presented the law to
the Texas Supreme
Court for their review.  The court refused to even hear the case to
reinstate the law for
fear that they would have to rule on the issue and then lose the
immunity they stole from
the people.  
The Texas Supreme Court is made up of politically motivated Judges that
have already
been censored on the TV news show 60 Minutes.  It is well known that the
Court is made
up of people that put themselves above the citizen rather than putting
the rights of the
citizen in their constitutionally protected position of ruling over the
government.
If anyone is interested in looking at the real documents, as written by
our founding
fathers, and by the founding fathers of Texas, please contact me and I
will give you
access to these papers.
I can prove that the right to sue the State was stolen.  I can prove
that the right to free
legal counsel was stolen.  I can prove that the statute law in Texas
allows any citizen to
sue the State.  I can prove that the Supreme Court of Texas is crooked
and is trying to
steal this right from the citizen.  I challenge anyone to refute my
information



SEND ANY COMMENTS TO:
antigov@earthlink.net